
however satisfying and reassuring.
Carl Sagan
Ahora toca el turno a la iglesia mormona demostrar su benevolencia y fineza:
Within the Church, the young person who experiments with homosexual behavior should be counseled with, not excommunicated. But as the adolescent moves into adulthood and continues to engage in sinful practices far beyond the level of experimentation, then the consequences within the Church must grow more severe and more long-lasting; unfortunately, they may also be more public as well...
... Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books, not to be indiscriminately enforced against anyone who happens to be caught violating them, but to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those whoflagrantly violate society's regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society.
The Latter Day Saints church is under no obligation to protect some supposed "right" of those members who would like to persuade us that neither God nor the prophets has the authority to regulate them.If the Church has no authority to tell its members that they may not engage in homosexual practices, then it has no authority at all. And if we accept the argument of the hypocrites of homosexuality that their sin is not a sin, we have destroyed ourselves.
The repentant homosexual must be met with forgiveness. Even hypocritical homosexuals must be treated individually with compassion. But the collective behavior of the hypocrites of homosexuality must be met with our most forceful arguments and our complete intolerance of their lies. To act otherwise is to give more respect to the opinions of men than to the judgments of God.
Which Peanuts Character Are You? | |
![]() | You are Charlie Brown. You are always optimistic and persistent, and everyone appreciates your simple sweetness. Sometimes, however, your anxieties get the best of you, and life's mysteries can confuse you. |
Find Your Character @ BrainFall.com |
Nada como rezarle a Diosito y darle un par de nalgadas a tu vieja por la mañana. En la escala de llanto del Niño Dios, esta práctica tiene una: happy face.A domestic discipline marriage is one in which one partner in the marriage is given authority over the other and has the means to back the authority, usually by spanking.
A Christian Domestic Discipline marriage is one that is set up according to Biblical standards; that is, the husband is the authority in the household. The wife is submissive to her husband as is fit in the Lord and her husband loves her as himself. He has the ultimate authority in his household, but it is tempered with the knowledge that he must answer to God for his actions and decisions. He has the authority to spank his wife for punishment. CDD is so much more than just spanking. It is the husband loving the wife enough to guide and teach her, and the wife loving the husband enough to follow his leadership. A Christian marriage embodies true romance and a Christian man a true hero.
That said, there are a few things we will not debate:
Wife spanking has probably been going on since shortly after God expelled Adam and Eve from the Garden. It is implied in the last portion of Genesis 3:16 - which, after addressing the difficulties of childbirth, says: “thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee”.; After forty years of marriage, my take on the spanking question is that it is less about *obedience* than improving the relationship - of which *obedience* maybe a component. There are simply those times when what needs to be said is beyond the capacity of verbal expression to communicate.
The Bible is God's inerrant Word and
we will honor it as literal and valid for all time.
The wife is to submit to her husband,
and the husband is to love the wife.
In CDD, the husband has authority to spank the wife.
The wife does not have authority to spank her husband.
...El arzobispo de León, José Guadalupe Martín Rábago, sugirió que la celebración del bicentenario de la Independencia “podría ser un momento privilegiado para crecer en una fructuosa reconciliación”, es decir, que esa fecha marque la discusión y eventual reforma de las leyes que hace 15 años dieron el reconocimiento jurídico a las iglesias y avanzar ahora en el tema de la libertad religiosa, incluyendo la “objeción de conciencia”. Y definió este apartado: “Toda persona tiene derecho a incumplir con una obligación legal y de naturaleza personal cuya realización produciría una lesión grave de la propia conciencia o de las creencias profesadas”.Bajo este supuesto, todo mundo podría infringir la ley, siguiendo sus 'creencias'. Yo podría matar al Presidente, pues creo que Elvis, quien se sienta a la derecha del Monstruo de Espagueti Volador, me ha dado la misión de erradicar de esta tierra a todo dirigente michoacano. También podría clavarle agujas en los ojos a Norberto Rivera pues las hadas que viven debajo de mi almohada me han dicho que sólo así el cardenal podrá abrir su conciencia ante los designios del unicornio mágico que come bananas rosas y exige sacrificios de corazones de doncellas que vivan en Iztapalapa.
Resaltó que cuando la discriminación religiosa se presenta es “inevitable que se produzcan heridas y enconos que terminan muchas veces en profundas divisiones de la población”.La iglesia católica debe saber muy bien esto, ya que son los discriminadores religiosos más exitosos del mundo. Habría que recordarle la Inquisición, la quema de brujas, las luchas religiosas en Irlanda, Europa oriental, Palestina, la matanza de indígenas en América, los mitos contra los judíos por cientos de años que derivaron, precisamente, en el Holocausto, etc. Digo, todo un continente se pobló de peregrinos HUYENDO DE LA IGLESIA CATÓLICA. ¿Con qué cara vienen a exigir libertad de creencias? ¿Y con qué vergüenza se hacen los perseguidos y oprimidos?